Agency, Freelancer or DIY: What Website Upkeep Really Costs
Once a website is live, someone has to keep it running: updates, backups, the occasional fix when something breaks. The agency vs freelancer website maintenance question — and the third option, doing it yourself — comes down to how much of that work you want to do personally, and how much risk you’re willing to carry if something goes wrong.
Here’s what each option actually involves, not just what it costs.
Option 1: DIY
Doing your own maintenance costs nothing extra out of pocket, but it isn’t free — it costs your time, and it requires you to actually know what needs doing.
At minimum, DIY maintenance means:
– Applying WordPress core, theme and plugin updates regularly, and testing that nothing broke afterward
– Taking backups on a schedule, and storing them somewhere other than the same server
– Watching for the site going down or slowing down
– Knowing enough to diagnose a problem when one shows up, or knowing who to call when you don’t
This works fine for a simple site that rarely changes, run by someone who’s comfortable in the WordPress dashboard and has the time to check on it regularly. It stops working the moment the site gets more complex, the owner gets busier, or something breaks in a way that needs real troubleshooting.
Option 2: A freelancer
Hiring a freelancer usually costs less per hour than an agency, and you get a direct line to the person doing the work. The trade-offs are about availability and continuity, not skill.
A few things worth asking any freelancer before you hire them for ongoing maintenance:
– What happens if they’re unavailable when something breaks — sick, on holiday, or just busy with another client?
– Do they document what they’ve done, or does the knowledge live only in their head?
– Is there a backup person, or are you the backup plan if they disappear?
– How do they handle emergencies outside normal hours?
None of this means freelancers are a bad choice — plenty of small, stable sites are well served by one reliable freelancer. The US Chamber of Commerce has a solid rundown of what to check before hiring one (How to Hire a Freelancer, US Chamber of Commerce), and most of it applies directly to ongoing website work, not just one-off projects.
Option 3: An agency
An agency costs more than a freelancer for the same hour of work, and the reason is what’s behind that hour: a team instead of one person, documented processes, and coverage when someone’s out sick or on leave.
What you’re generally paying for with an agency:
– Continuity — the work doesn’t stop if one person is unavailable
– A process for backups, updates and monitoring that doesn’t depend on one person remembering
– Faster response on anything urgent, because there’s more than one person who can pick it up
– Accountability — someone to escalate to if something isn’t handled well
Our own maintenance plans run Basic Care at €100 (~$115) a month, Pro Care at €250 (~$290) a month, and Partner Care at €450 (~$520) a month, each adding more monthly development time, faster response and more frequent backups as you go up. Extra development beyond what’s included is €75 (~$85) an hour. For the full detail on what’s actually in each tier, see our breakdown of website maintenance packages, or check our own maintenance plans directly.
The transition point most businesses hit
Most small businesses don’t pick one option and stay there forever. It’s common to start with DIY when the site is brand new and simple, move to a freelancer once there’s enough going on that doing it yourself starts costing real time, and eventually move to an agency once downtime would actually hurt the business or the freelancer relationship becomes a single point of failure the owner isn’t comfortable with anymore.
None of those moves mean the earlier choice was wrong. DIY was probably the right call when the site was five pages and barely changed. A freelancer was probably the right call once updates needed real attention but the business still couldn’t justify an agency’s monthly cost. The mistake isn’t picking the “wrong” option at some point — it’s staying on an option well past the point where the site’s risk has outgrown it.
What actually decides agency vs freelancer website maintenance
Price alone doesn’t answer the question. What should is:
- How much does downtime actually cost your business? A site that generates leads or sales every day can’t afford a slow response. A brochure site for a business that runs mostly offline has more room to wait.
- Do you have the time and comfort level to do it yourself? Be honest about whether “I’ll get to it” has actually been true for the last six months.
- What happens if your one point of contact disappears? With DIY, that’s you. With a freelancer, that’s them. With an agency, it’s usually covered.
- How complex is the site, and how often does it change? A static site with five pages needs far less than a store or a site with regular new content.
We wrote more on why this matters in who’s actually updating your website — a surprising number of small businesses assume someone’s handling it when nobody actually is.
The honest answer
There’s no universally “right” choice between agency vs freelancer website maintenance and doing it yourself. A small, simple, rarely-changing site can run fine on DIY. A growing business that can’t afford downtime usually outgrows both DIY and a single freelancer and needs the continuity an agency provides. Match the option to how much risk you can actually absorb if something breaks at the wrong time, not to which number looks smallest on a quote.
If you want a plain read on which option fits your specific site, ask us for a free website audit — we’ll tell you honestly, even if the answer isn’t “hire us.”
If nobody's looking after your site, hand it off.
Our Website as a Service model handles upkeep, security, and improvements for a predictable monthly fee — so you never have to think about it.
See how WaaS works
